AI code reviewfor teams
CodeCritic is an online code review service for groups that outgrow ad-hoc tools: one workspace, shared standards, GitHub at scale, optional API automation, and optional custom LLM routing when your security policy requires it. Start small on the free tier - prove value - then roll out with a plan that matches volume.
Why teams choose it
A code review platform that scales with you
Pilot on the free tier with a single repo or paste flow. When the whole group standardizes on CodeCritic, upgrade for higher limits, GitHub breadth, and automation. Exact quotas and enterprise options are listed on Pricing.
Shared workspace
Bring developers under one org with consistent review quality. Everyone sees the same standards whether they paste snippets in the browser or connect GitHub repos.
Security-minded defaults
2FA, session controls, and API keys sit where administrators expect them. Rotate keys, terminate sessions, and audit usage without filing another IT ticket for each developer.
Centralized billing
Company-level subscription and balance so finance sees one line item. Top up or change plans from a single owner account instead of reconciling individual expenses.
Company-aware flows
Team and company constructs in the product map how you onboard developers and attach them to the right subscription.
API for automation
When you are ready, the same HTTP API that powers CI integrations scales to org-wide automation - rate limits and features follow your plan.
Rollout
How teams usually adopt CodeCritic
- 1
Pilot with one squad
Pick a team that already feels review pain. Run real PRs or pasted code so stakeholders see output quality before you standardize.
- 2
Align on policy
Decide what “must fix” means for you, when to block merges, and how AI output complements human review - not replaces it.
- 3
Connect GitHub org-wide
Wire OAuth, webhooks, and Actions for the repos that matter. Expand repo coverage as confidence grows.
- 4
Consolidate billing
Move to a shared plan so usage, invoices, and optional custom LLM settings roll up to the right owner.
For engineering leads
Operational clarity, not another siloed tool
Rolling out AI code review company-wide only works if developers trust the signal. CodeCritic returns grouped findings with plain-language rationale so stand-ups stay focused on disagreements, not on decoding raw tool output. That is why teams pair us with existing linters and tests - we sit in the “judgment” layer where context matters.
When you connect GitHub, PR threads stay the source of truth for debate; CodeCritic accelerates the first pass so seniors spend time on architecture and edge cases.
On the governance side, you get levers that match how B2B SaaS is bought: org-friendly billing, API keys for automation, and security settings that your IT checklist expects. Optional custom LLM endpoints (on supported plans) let you keep inference inside approved providers - see Features for the current surface area.
Need a lightweight on-ramp first? Point individuals at the online tool and free tier before you commit the whole org.
Checklist for evaluators
- GitHub: connect org repos and run PR reviews where your process already lives - see GitHub code review.
- API and automation: HTTP API and GitHub Action for pipelines - details on Features.
- Try before you standardize: Free code review tier for pilots, then upgrade when the whole team is in.
FAQ
AI code review for teams
Bring your team to CodeCritic
Create a workspace, invite members as you grow, and align on a plan when usage justifies it.