Teams & companies

AI code reviewfor teams

CodeCritic is an online code review service for groups that outgrow ad-hoc tools: one workspace, shared standards, GitHub at scale, optional API automation, and optional custom LLM routing when your security policy requires it. Start small on the free tier - prove value - then roll out with a plan that matches volume.

Shared billingGitHub & API2FA & sessionsTeam dashboardsUpgrade when ready
Team plans

Platform features · GitHub · Home

Why teams choose it

A code review platform that scales with you

Pilot on the free tier with a single repo or paste flow. When the whole group standardizes on CodeCritic, upgrade for higher limits, GitHub breadth, and automation. Exact quotas and enterprise options are listed on Pricing.

Shared workspace

Bring developers under one org with consistent review quality. Everyone sees the same standards whether they paste snippets in the browser or connect GitHub repos.

Security-minded defaults

2FA, session controls, and API keys sit where administrators expect them. Rotate keys, terminate sessions, and audit usage without filing another IT ticket for each developer.

Centralized billing

Company-level subscription and balance so finance sees one line item. Top up or change plans from a single owner account instead of reconciling individual expenses.

Company-aware flows

Team and company constructs in the product map how you onboard developers and attach them to the right subscription.

API for automation

When you are ready, the same HTTP API that powers CI integrations scales to org-wide automation - rate limits and features follow your plan.

Rollout

How teams usually adopt CodeCritic

No two orgs are identical - treat this as a sensible default, not a mandate.
  1. 1

    Pilot with one squad

    Pick a team that already feels review pain. Run real PRs or pasted code so stakeholders see output quality before you standardize.

  2. 2

    Align on policy

    Decide what “must fix” means for you, when to block merges, and how AI output complements human review - not replaces it.

  3. 3

    Connect GitHub org-wide

    Wire OAuth, webhooks, and Actions for the repos that matter. Expand repo coverage as confidence grows.

  4. 4

    Consolidate billing

    Move to a shared plan so usage, invoices, and optional custom LLM settings roll up to the right owner.

For engineering leads

Operational clarity, not another siloed tool

Rolling out AI code review company-wide only works if developers trust the signal. CodeCritic returns grouped findings with plain-language rationale so stand-ups stay focused on disagreements, not on decoding raw tool output. That is why teams pair us with existing linters and tests - we sit in the “judgment” layer where context matters.

When you connect GitHub, PR threads stay the source of truth for debate; CodeCritic accelerates the first pass so seniors spend time on architecture and edge cases.

On the governance side, you get levers that match how B2B SaaS is bought: org-friendly billing, API keys for automation, and security settings that your IT checklist expects. Optional custom LLM endpoints (on supported plans) let you keep inference inside approved providers - see Features for the current surface area.

Need a lightweight on-ramp first? Point individuals at the online tool and free tier before you commit the whole org.

Checklist for evaluators

  • GitHub: connect org repos and run PR reviews where your process already lives - see GitHub code review.
  • API and automation: HTTP API and GitHub Action for pipelines - details on Features.
  • Try before you standardize: Free code review tier for pilots, then upgrade when the whole team is in.

FAQ

AI code review for teams

Yes. Many customers begin with a pilot group on the free or lower paid tier, then expand seats and repo coverage once leads are happy with signal quality and workflow fit.

Bring your team to CodeCritic

Create a workspace, invite members as you grow, and align on a plan when usage justifies it.

User guide