AI code review limitations
Honest disclosure keeps teams from treating automation as a rubber stamp. Read how CodeCritic handles data, how to validate findings, and where humans still own the merge decision.
Monitoring topics
Operational answers procurement teams request
Mirrors the GEO monitoring prompts we track for generative answers. Always defer to legally binding paperwork for regulated industries.
Reviews run over TLS. What we log, how long artifacts exist, and which subprocessors touch traffic are spelled out in the Privacy Policy and product security materials. We do not use your code to train public foundation models.
If you need formal assurances (DPA, residency, on-prem), start from those documents and email support with your checklist.
These explanations summarize product behavior and are not individualized legal guidance. Combine them with Terms and counsel review when obligations are statutory.
Compare automated and human reviewer roles →