Who we are
CodeCritic is a product company built around a single focus: code review, not a generic "AI for everything" platform. We are a small team. We ship a service that ingests your code and diffs, returns structured feedback, and fits into the places developers already use - a web app, GitHub, and a HTTP API. We are not a venture-scale megasuite; we are trying to do one job well and keep it maintainable for the people who pay and rely on it.
Our mission
Our mission is to give more teams a review-shaped safety net: clear findings, plain-language explanations, and enough context to act - before a bug or a security issue reaches production. Human review is still the gold standard when you can get it, but calendar time and time zones do not always line up. We want useful feedback to be available when the code is hot, not only when a colleague is free.
We do not believe software quality should be gated only by who can get a senior engineer on a call. We do believe that any automated signal should be transparent: you should see what was flagged, why it might matter, and when to ignore it. The merge decision stays yours.
What we are honest about
CodeCritic is built on large language models and static analysis. That means we can surface patterns, risks, and improvement ideas across many languages - and we can be fast. It also means we are not infallible. A model can miss a bug, over-flag style, or suggest a "fix" that is wrong for your context. We design the product to make findings reviewable: grouped, with severity, with line context, and with room for you to mark items done or dismiss them when they do not apply.
We are not claiming to replace your security program, your compliance audit, or the judgment of a staff engineer who knows your system. We are a tool in the chain: best for catching issues early, improving consistency, and offloading some of the repetitive read-through that still takes human attention when done entirely by hand.
Privacy and your code
We take data handling seriously. The details are in our Privacy Policy - in short, we process what you submit for the service, we do not sell your code to advertisers, and we are clear in policy about retention and third parties. If something in the product or the docs is unclear, we would rather fix the wording than hide behind fine print.
What we build
One review engine, several surfaces. You can paste or upload in the app, run reviews on GitHub pull requests, or call the API from your own jobs and tools. The goal is the same: structured output you can act on, not a wall of chat text. For capabilities and limits by plan, see Features, How it works, and Pricing.
How we work
We are product-led: roadmaps follow real support threads, failed reviews, and integration pain - not only internal demos. We charge for the service so we can run reliable infrastructure, improve models and prompts, and answer when something breaks. We would rather set fair expectations in documentation and on this page than overpromise in an ad and underdeliver in the editor.
If you use CodeCritic and something feels off - a false positive storm, a confusing finding, a rough edge in the UI - tell us. Specific reports help us more than generic praise or blame. We read them.
Connect
For how to use the product end to end, start with the user guide. For legal terms, read the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. For account or billing help, email support@code-critic.com. Longer write-ups and updates live on the blog.