Code review that scaleswith a tiny team
You do not have a bench of senior reviewers yet. CodeCritic gives every PR a consistent first pass so founders and early engineers ship faster without baking in preventable bugs.
Senior voice on day one
New hires get feedback styled like an experienced reviewer, not just ESLint errors, while leads stay focused on product bets.
Pay as you grow
Start on the free tier, add repos and seats when funding or revenue supports it. No enterprise sales call required to try the core loop.
Investor diligence ready
Show a documented review habit in data room conversations: automated first pass plus human merge approval on main.
Startup-friendly workflow
Most seed-stage teams wire GitHub, turn on PR comments, and keep human review on main only.
- Founding engineer merges feature branches after reading AI findings, not every line by two people.
- Contractors submit PRs; automation catches obvious security issues before code touches production creds.
- Weekly release cadence uses the same review engine for hotfix branches and experiments.
Checklist
- Protect main early Branch protection plus automated review beats heroic late-night pushes as soon as you have paying users.
- Keep scope small Review the diff you ship, not the whole legacy codebase, until you schedule dedicated hardening sprints.
FAQ
Common questions
Related pages
Review like you already have a staff engineer
Sign up, connect GitHub, and run your next feature PR through the same loop bigger teams use.